Not sure if I did something, but there's a small arrow that now appears above my header on every page of my site: muzzmarketing.com. Can someone take a look, and let me know how I might get rid of it? Thanks so much.

what version of atahualpa and WP?
there is a post about this, had something to do with an extra > in the CSS it was fixed and doesn't happen in 3.5.3 (if this is the same issue)

Well... I have Atahualpa 3.5.3 and WP 3.0.1. Is there a way I can manually fix it?

I totally understand your comment about including what I might have done to cause the problem. I added some html code to add bullet points to a table, but that's all I've done today. I rechecked all of the entries to see if there's any extra code, but everything looks good. I don't have much in CSS inserts; everything looks clean there too. Not sure what else to check...

I think it is the comment line for the hubspot tracking code

<!-- End of HubSpot Tracking Code -->>

get rid of the last '>'

I apologize for not providing all the details. This is my first web site and first exposure to CSS and HTML so I'm not up to speed on the protocol. I'll get there with your help! At any rate, I looked at the HubSpot tracking code, and did not find a double >>.

Here's what shows in my CSS Inserts file. Should I be looking somewhere else as well?


!-- Start of HubSpot Tracking Code -->
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript"> var hs_portalid=67877; var hs_salog_version = "2.00"; var hs_ppa = "eclipsehr.app6.hubspot.com"; document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + document.location.protocol + "//" + hs_ppa + "/salog.js.aspx' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); </script>
<!-- End of HubSpot Tracking Code -->

What's on the very next line after <!-- End of HubSpot Tracking Code -->?

Nothing! There was a blank line, so I deleted it hoping that might be the solution. But, no luck...

Well, I didn't see any issues with the HubSpot tracking code, but when I removed it, the arrow went away. I still find it strange that juggledad saw two >> at the end of the code, whereas I only saw 1. Could that still be a bug? Thanks to all for your help.