Click here to register or to donate. Auto self-registration is not available here - far too many spammers. This forum has many, many backlinks and because of that there is an intense desire among spammers to drop their links here.
I'm wondering if anyone has checked their Atahualpa or TF sites for code compliance at http://validator.w3.org How clean is the code these things write?
May 16, 2012, 06:05 AM
3,768 posts · Oct 2008
Ultimately real world browser coverage is the most important in my opinion. That doesn't mean that W3C is ignored, but I suggest that even if there are "errors" one should have a closer look at what kind of errors these are.
Also, HTML5 is still a working draft (and might be until 2013/2014), so, as far as HTML5 elements are concerned the W3C results should not be taken too seriously. W3C actually says that themselves somewhere on their site.